It was a “don’t make me come back there” moment from the Federal Reserve.
A line from the minutes of the central bank’s December policy meeting released Wednesday afternoon was taken by analysts and economists as a warning to financial market participants that bets on a policy pivot in 2023 aren’t welcome. And, to the extent that equity rallies and other financial market developments loosen overall financial conditions, those wagers will only force the Fed’s policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee to prolong the pain necessary to bring down inflation.
Here’s the line: “Participants noted that, because monetary policy worked importantly through financial markets, an unwarranted easing in financial conditions, especially if driven by a misperception by the public of the Committee’s reaction function, would complicate the Committee’s effort to restore price stability.”
In plain English? “Translated from Fedspeak, the FOMC members do not like stock market rallies, since they fear it could result in potentially inflationary consumer spending,” said Louis Navellier, president and founder of Navellier & Associates, in a Thursday note.
And what can the Fed do about it?
“Said differently, if equities continue to rally on bad economic news, the Fed will need to push forward to an even higher terminal rate and unofficially add ‘weaker stocks’ to the mandate,” wrote Ian Lyngen and Benjamin Jeffery, rates strategist at BMO Capital Markets, in a Wednesday note.
“The minutes revealed another deliberate effort to dissuade the market of the notion that the Fed ‘put’ will be triggered in 2023,” they wrote.
Investors have talked of a figurative Fed put option since at least the October 1987 stock-market crash prompted the Alan Greenspan-led central bank to lower interest rates. An actual put option is a financial derivative that gives the holder the right but not the obligation to sell the underlying asset at a set level, known as the strike price, serving as an insurance policy against a market decline.
“Embedded in this discussion is the question of how much downside in U.S. equities the [Federal Open Market Committee] is willing to weather in its effort to re-establish the forward price stability assumption — [Wednesday’s] official communiqué lowered the level in stocks at which investors will look for a Fed pivot,” the BMO strategists wrote.
The minutes made clear that the “proverbial Fed put is officially dead and gone,” said Kent Engelke, chief economic strategist at Capitol Securities Management, in a Thursday note.
Stocks had bounced off 2022 lows set in October heading into the Fed’s Dec. 13-14 policy meeting, but soon lost traction, losing ground into the end of the month as major indexes booked their worst yearly performance since 2008. Stocks ended higher after the release of the minutes on Wednesday, then slumped the next session.
Stocks were soaring Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up more than 500 points, or 1.6%, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite matched gains. The rally came after the December jobs report showed an unexpected slowdown in wage growth and the Institute for Supply Management’s services gauge slumped into contraction territory.
The minutes showed no Fed officials expected rates to fall in 2023, underlining a divide between the central bank and market participants over the likelihood of a pivot away from tighter policy later this year.
“The minutes clearly highlight the Fed’s focus on inflation but also their displeasure with the loosening in financial market conditions, which they believed hindered their efforts to achieve price stability,” said Ryan Sweet, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, in a Wednesday note. “Reading the tea leaves, the minutes stress that the Fed is going to reduce inflation at the risk of hurting the labor market and the broader economy.”
Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said Wednesday that the mention of financial conditions was meant to convey that investors shouldn’t expect policy makers “to soften their inflation line until it becomes blindingly obvious that a serious shift in the data is under way.”